
What Happens After a Contract is Breached?
What happens after a breach of contract?
Well, what happens before and during are just as important questions to
ask. Breach of contract claims in employment law can be tricky but with
the guidance of an Employment Attorney, they can be little less
complex. An Employment Attorneywho
represents employees against their employer is the type of attorney who
may be able to decipher whether there was an implied or expressed
promise made by an employer to their employee and whether or not that
promise was fulfilled. Below are some points to keep in mind about
breach of contract in employment situations.
The rundown
In
California, employees are automatically considered as at will. At will
employment basically means that an employee can be terminated for any
reason or for no reason at all. The "at will" literally means the
employer can decide to fire an employee at their own will without cause,
even if they just feel like getting rid of an employee. For example, a
boss could call an employee into his or her office today and say "Bob,
I've decided the sound of your voice sounds like nails on a chalkboard,
no one likes you at the office either. You're fired". Technically he or
she could do that to poor Bob because he's an at-will employee and the
employer can just decide to fire employees when he or she pleases. This
means you cannot sue your boss for a breach of contract claim if you are
fired.
There is an exception to the at-will employee rule, which
is that an employer cannot terminate an employee if it is based on an
illegal reason. An illegal reason would be if an employer terminated an
employee based on the employee belonging to a protected class or
possessing a protected characteristic. The law considers certain classes
and characteristics protected such as marital status, race, age,
religion, creed, sexual orientation, ethnicity, veteran status, military
status, pregnancy, medical condition, or disability.
If an employer's reason for firing an employee is based on the employee
belonging to a protected class or the employee having a protected
characteristic, then that may be considered as prohibited by the law. In
looking at the previous example of poor Bob, let's say Bob was born and
raised in Mexico. Prior to Bob's boss firing him because his voice was
annoying and he wasn't the most likable guy in the office, his boss had
made derogatory remarks about "Mexicans". On a few occasions Bob's boss
had made jokes about how " all Mexicans were lazy". Bob's manager who
hired him was the only other Mexican and was fired a week before Bob. In
this example, there may be evidence that demonstrates that Bob was
fired for an illegal reason. Although Bob's boss said it was because he
was simply not liked at the office, the fact that his boss had made
remarks that singled Bob out based on being of Mexican descent on top of
the fact that the only other Mexican employee at the office was also
fired indicates that Bob was fired based on his ethnicity. Here, Bob may
be able to prove that he was fired for an illegal reason because it was
based on his ethnicity which is a protected class according to employment laws in California. But again, this would not be considered a breach of contract claim.
The other exception
As
mentioned previously, employees in California are automatically
considered as at-will employees because California is an at will state.
An employee who is at-will can be fired at the will of their employer
without cause, but there is another exception to this rule. An employee
may not even be considered at will in certain circumstances which means
he or she cannot be terminated without cause. The circumstances that
would render an employee to be considered as not an at-will would be if
the employee can prove that he she had a contract with the employer that
said otherwise. The contract can expressly or impliedly indicate that
the contract would have a fixed time of employment and/or the employee
could only be terminated if there is a cause.
If an employee
cannot provide proof that there was an expressed or implied contract
that provided that he or she was on a fixed term of employment and or he
or she could not be terminated without cause, then the employee is
considered at-will and therefore can be terminated for any reason or for
no reason. Where an employee can provide proof that he or she was
terminated while there was indeed an expressed or implied contract in
place that had a fixed term of employment and/or that the employee could
not be terminated without cause, the employee may have a claim in
breach of contract and possibly wrongful termination. An Employment
Attorney may be able to assist an employee or former employee should
they have any questions regarding expressed or implied contracts. Also,
an Employment Attorney may also be able to provide legal advice on any
questions concerning whether a former employee has a breach of contract
case and/or a wrongful termination case.
Breach of contract claims for at-will employees
An
employee may be able to bring a claim against their employer for breach
of contract even though the employee is an at-will employee. If an
employee is promised by their employer that he or she will receive some
kind of a benefit such as a pay increase after a stated term of
employment and the employee is terminated before all the terms of the
agreement are carried out, then the employee may recover. Usually, the
employer could terminate the employee without cause, but where there is a
promised benefit at the end of a fixed term and then the employee is
fired for no reason before all the terms of the promise are carried out,
the employee may be able to recover some of that money. In this kind of
situation, a former employee may have a breach of contract claim against their former employer, in which case he or she should call an Employment Attorney for representation.
Dealing with a possible breach of contract claim can be overwhelming but with the assistance of the right Employment Attorney, it is possible to recover.